Want to see some illustrations of the reasons why the mainline churches are in trouble? Look no farther than the story in the Roanoke Times today about a visit by Episcopal Presiding Bishop Katherine Jefforts-Schori to southwestern Virginia:
Calling for economic evangelism and political advocacy, the Most Rev. Katherine Jefferts Schori, elected leader of the nation’s 2.7 million Episcopal Church members, roused an audience of her denomination’s regional leaders in Roanoke on Saturday.
Reason #1: the confusion of evangelism with social activism and political advocacy. It shouldn’t be hard to tell the difference, but for some they are all the same thing. Writing a letter to a congresscritter stating your opinion that food stamp allowances should be raised is the same as witnessing to the tranforming impact of the lif, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.
And Jefferts Schori urges a roll-up-your-sleeves brand of Christianity that’s big on persuading church members to volunteer in community service, dig deeper into their pockets to furnish food for the world’s impoverished and nudge politicians to provide more help for the hungry.
Her activist message resonated with Southwest Virginia pastors such as Vince Carroll, rector of Trinity Episcopal Church in Richlands. “She reminds me of something the Apostle Paul said, ‘The poor will always be with you.’ But you damn well better do something to help them out.”
Reason #2: ignorance of Scripture even among the clergy. It was, of course, Jesus who said “the poor you will always have with you” (Matthew 26:11, Mark 14:7, John 12:8). This isn’t just a matter of not being able to remember addresses, either. The expression comes in the context of a woman (John says it was Mary of Bethany) anointing Jesus with expensive perfume, which others objected to because the perfume could have been sold and the proceeds given to the poor. But Jesus rebuked them, both for ignoring the “beautiful thing” she had done to Him and for missing the prophetic significance of the act, which was to anoint Him ahead of time for burial. In fact, while there’s no doubt that Jesus highly valued ministry to the poor, the message f this particular passage is exactly the opposite of the one that Rev. Carroll assigns to it. Then again, if you’re going to decide what the teaching and mission of the church is based on the New York Times editorial page, I don’t suppose it really matter.
There’s nothing esoteric about her take on theology. “It’s refreshing to hear her put it in very straightforward terms,” said Deborah Hunley, rector of Christ Episcopal Church in Roanoke’s Old Southwest neighborhood. “What we are as a church is defined by the good we actually do for others.”
Reason #3: failure to grasp the proper mission of the church. The church is not defined by “the good we actually do for others” (that would be the Lions Club or the local food pantry). The church is defined by its faithful relationship with the Lord who constitutes it as His body. As such, our mission is not to “do good,” our mission is to carry our the work that God has assigned us, much of which (for instance, witnessing to the truth of the gospel, making disciples, teaching them Jesus’ commandments, baptizing them–you know, Great Commission stuff) the world doesn’t consider good, and in fact positively repudiates.
In her address, [Schori] barely mentioned the traditional church mission of saving souls. Instead, she zeroed in on the need for “social justice ministry,” specifically to rally to such causes as improving health care, education and job opportunities. Further, she encouraged church leadership to press politicians into helping Third World nations develop economically — plugging debt reduction and fair trade.
Reason #4: mistaking the church for a political party. What Schori wants these people to be is Democratic Party activists, not Episcopalians. In her vision of what the church and its mission are, Schori has traded in the glorious vision of the Kingdom of God for the earthly (and in truth, miserly) vision of a government program. If that’s all the church is, I’d just as soon go to work for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services or Labor or Education. The government’s pension program is better than the church’s.
(Via T19.)
January 27, 2008 at 8:48 pm
Excellent commentary David,
You with the help of Ms Schori have definitely pinpointed the problem with all the Liberal side of the mainline denominations. And they don’t seem to have a clue about the meaning of any biblical text.
January 27, 2008 at 8:53 pm
You got a bite from your shameless plug on T:19, Reformed Pastor, but I’m glad I came. It’s good to know that you have your own blog.
I regularly send out info to a big email list, with analysis of the goings on in TEC. I will link this story of yours. You have done a great job with breaking apart this article.
January 27, 2008 at 9:13 pm
The really tragic thing about this is, that if you put the Lord first, the good works follow. Good works proceed from faith, not the other way around.
January 28, 2008 at 11:16 am
You’re right on all four points.
The problem, as I see it, is that this (which is by no means limited to Schori – but is true of the leadership of virtually all the legacy denominations) amounts to stealing. It takes the Gospel of Jesus Christ away and replaces it with a pathetic and ill-advised brand of political action. The people who do this are nothing other than thieves.
So the obvious question – how do thieves manage to get into the positions of leadership in virtually every mainline (and some evangelical and in theory theologically sound) organization?
February 7, 2008 at 6:01 pm
Hey people I may agree with some of your theological concerns but the attack & gossip stuff is not on Biblically. I’m a Pastor from New Zealand & am appalled at the dotting of t’s & crossing of i’s that many get into. I want to ask the question, ‘Have you personally sat down & talked through your concerns with the people you are critical of ?’. If you have not then can I please remind you of the Mathew 18 passage where the one to one then two or more & only then should it be taken to the whole church & I would suggest an attack type forum like this is not appropriate. It is what it looks like if we have not followed Scriptural order, nothing but gossip and the consequences are severe.
If there is a problem talk to the person. It may be that they will repent or it may be that they don’t really think the way they have been reported. I had a painful experience where I had been missreported & there was little I could do to stop people thinking & saying things that were simply not true.
I hold a strong position on Scripture & the need for the church to address issues but we need to follow fully what we say we believe.
Grace & His Power & Life be in you,
Gary
February 7, 2008 at 6:22 pm
I’m not sure what you mean by “gossip stuff,” Pastor. What Schori is quoted as saying is public knowledge, it’s undisputed by her, and it isn’t directed at me personally, so I also don’t see why Matthew 18 would apply. This has much more to do with the portions of the NT that has to do with heresy or apostasy. Working against that is what this is all about.
Blessings on your ministry. Thanks for coming by.