The Rev. Jeremiah Wright seems determined to stay in the news. Over the last couple of days, in speeches to the Detroit NAACP and at the National Press Club in Washington, Wright has only strengthened the perception that he is an unhinged racist, according to ABC’s Jack Tapper. First, there’s the NAACP speech:
The bulk of his remarks addressed, however, different groups seeing each other as deficient. He acted out the differences between marching bands at predominantly black and predominantly white colleges. “Africans have a different meter, and Africans have a different tonality,” he said. Europeans have seven tones, Africans have five. White people clap differently than black people. “Africans and African-Americans are right-brained, subject-oriented in their learning style,” he said. “They have a different way of learning.” And so on.
After jokingly mocking the Boston accents of former Presidents John F. and Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass., Wright said, “nobody says to a Kennedy, ‘You speak bad English,’ only to a black child was that said.” Wright said that he believes “a change is going to come, ’cause many of us are committed to change how we see others who are different.”
Anyone white who said that “white people clap differently than black people” or that blacks are “right-brained” (implying whites are “left-brained”) would be assumed to wear sheets and hoods in his spare time. Individuals may be right-brained or left-brained; races may not. Individuals may have different musical abilities or styles; races do not. Having a Boston accent doesn’t make one a poor speaker of English; bad grammar does. For one who claims to have been prophetically fighting racism his whole career, Wright looks like a mirror image of what he supposedly has been fighting.
Then there’s the speech at the Press Club this morning, in which Wright reiterated his most lunatic charge:
On his contention that the U.S. government had created AIDS as a method of committing genocide against African-Americans, Wright referred to a hotly-disputed 1996 book Emerging Viruses: AIDS And Ebola : Nature, Accident or Intentional? by Leonard G Horowitz, which contends that AIDS and the Ebola viruses evolved during cancer experiments on monkeys.
He also referenced Medical Apartheid: The Dark History of Medical Experimentation on Black Americans from Colonial Times to the Present by Harriet Washington, and said based on the Tuskegee experiment — in which the U.S. Public Health Service conducted a 40-year study on 400 poor black men in Alabama with syphilis whom they did not properly treat — “I believe our government is capable of anything.”
There’s no doubt that the Tuskegee experiments were a horrible episode, a black stain on the federal government and the medical professionals who participated. But those experiments no more prove Wright’s AIDS allegations than the Holocaust proves that Germany is currently exterminating Jews. For proof, Wright turns to tinfoil hat dentist Leonard Horowitz, whose Web sites paint a picture of a genuine crackpot. On Wikipedia he’s described this way:
Author of more than sixteen books, Dr. Horowitz is globally known as the most outspoken critic of what he calls “the ongoing genocide committed by the ‘military-medical-petrochemical- pharmaceutical cartel,’” (a phrase he coined). He has been a staunch proponent of natural healing using sound, color, oxygen, nutrition, and water-based therapies.
Many persons internationally recognize Dr. Horowitz as a prophet. Including Rev. Richard S.C. Kirby, President and Chaplain of the Kepler Academy, Inc., and Chaplain in the World Network of Religious Futurists, wrote extensively of Dr. Horowitz’s prophetic calling in the Foreword to Dr. Horowitz’s book, Walk on Water. A few Bible scholars even say he is an Apostle for his revealing works that are changing generations.
In this regard, Dr. Horowitz claims to be guided by the revelatory angel of the Messianic community in Philadelphia (Rev. 3:7-13) to herald the “key to the House of David” that opens doors no man can close, and closes doors no human can open. That “key,” Dr. Horowitz insists, has everything do do with the Divine and sacred nature of water, increasingly proven by advances in water science, to fulfill the prophecy of Revelation 14:1-6 for hosting the concert for the 144,000 required to secure Peace on Earth.
Sorry for the extended digression (I just thought that stuff about Horowitz too funny to pass up). The point is that this is the sort of cross-fertilization between nutcases that causes the rest of us to shake our heads and wonder why the United Church of Christ continues to defend Wright. There’s yet another example of that defense today at the Washington Post‘s “On Faith” page, where UCC seminary president Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite again takes Wright’s critics to task:
I have spoken to many white Americans regarding this controversy and it has become evident to me that while many are shocked by the language of judgment on America, it is the form of the sermon presentation that is more upsetting. People can come to accept that Rev. Wright is interpreting the judgment on the nations represented by the biblical prophet Malachi and yet still be unable to get past the form—the image of what appears to be an angry African American man in African garb shouting and waving his arms. It is the seemingly angry African American man that is shocking white America and I think, at bottom, this is what I think many white people can’t get past.
Actually, what I can’t get past is the image of a man with an earned doctorate swallowing the patent medicine of nutballs like Horowitz whole, and spewing out racist nonsense at which white liberals like Thistlethwaite don’t bat an eye. That the UCC’s leadership continues to defend this man is a testimony to the politicized depths to which all too many in mainline leadership have fallen.
UPDATE: Dana Milbank of the Washington Post adds to what’s above:
Speaking before an audience that included Marion Barry, Cornel West, Malik Zulu Shabazz of the New Black Panther Party and Nation of Islam official Jamil Muhammad, Wright praised Louis Farrakhan, defended the view that Zionism is racism, accused the United States of terrorism, repeated his view that the government created the AIDS virus to cause the genocide of racial minorities, stood by other past remarks (“God damn America”) and held himself out as a spokesman for the black church in America.
His views on Farrakhan and Israel? “Louis said 20 years ago that Zionism, not Judaism, was a gutter religion. He was talking about the same thing United Nations resolutions say, the same thing now that President Carter’s being vilified for and Bishop Tutu’s being vilified for. And everybody wants to paint me as if I’m anti-Semitic because of what Louis Farrakhan said 20 years ago. He is one of the most important voices in the 20th and 21st century; that’s what I think about him. . . . Louis Farrakhan is not my enemy. He did not put me in chains, he did not put me in slavery, and he didn’t make me this color.”
Do I really have to cite quotes from Louis Farrakhan in which he spoke of Jews, not Zionism, in the most hateful and incendiary ways? Here’s just one:
“Do you know some of these satanic Jews have taken over BET?… Everything that we built, they have. The mind of Satan now is running the record industry, movie industry and television. And they make us look like we’re the murders; we look like we’re the gangsters, but we’re punk stuff.”
Ed Morrissey of Hot AIr has more, if you’ve got the stomach for it.
April 28, 2008 at 6:08 pm
I am so proud of the UCC and Rev. Wright!! They are truly living out the gospel of Christ by sharing Jesus’ message of forgiveness and grace to the world. It is so encouraging to see the national church stand firmly in support of Rev. Wright and his wonderful work in Chicago. Rev. Thistlewaithe is correct, as is Rev. Wright, that this whole affair is really an attack on the African-American church. Our country can’t seem to tolerate an African-American man who criticizes the government.
April 28, 2008 at 6:08 pm
This whole thing just makes me angry. Talk about weirdos with an ego, this Wright takes the case.
Can I claim when my blog is attacked that my critics are attacking the entire ‘white’ church? (whatever that is)
Never mind.
April 28, 2008 at 6:12 pm
“Can I claim when my blog is attacked that my critics are attacking the entire ‘white’ church? (whatever that is)”
I suppose you could if you were ripped from your family, had your genealogy destroyed, your last name stolen, and your descendants lived for 300 years under brutal, totalitarian, oppression. It would also help if you and your family were denied equal opportunity, lived 20 fewer years than the national average, and continually denigrated by our larger culture.
April 28, 2008 at 6:50 pm
I am so proud of the UCC and Rev. Wright!! They are truly living out the gospel of Christ by sharing Jesus’ message of forgiveness and grace to the world. It is so encouraging to see the national church stand firmly in support of Rev. Wright and his wonderful work in Chicago. Rev. Thistlewaithe is correct, as is Rev. Wright, that this whole affair is really an attack on the African-American church. Our country can’t seem to tolerate an African-American man who criticizes the government.
Mike: This is a joke, right? Or are you a racist as well?
As for your response to Toby, the point is this: no one is attacking “the black church.” They are attacking one particular pastor, who happens to be black. But then, lumping all people of the same race into the categories occupied by Jeremiah Wright (i.e., racist conspiracy-monger) is simply another expression is the same left-wing racism that Wright himself represents. Another way to put this is that we are judging Wright by the content of his character rather than the color of his skin. Would that the UCC could do the same.
April 28, 2008 at 7:18 pm
I wish someone would explain this to me. When some conservative Christian declares, for no discenible reason, that some attack or national disaster is God’s judgement on America for the acceptance of homosexuality, say, he is universally condemned. But when a United Organization of the Zeitgest “minister” utters some of the most anti-Semitic sentiments ever spoken in a public place or hallucinates that the US government invented AIDS to kill blacks, he is declared “prophetic” and any criticism of him is considered racist and out-of-bounds.
Oh and if “our country can’t seem to tolerate an African-American man who criticizes the government,” then why aren’t Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Bob Herbert, etc. in jail?
April 28, 2008 at 7:24 pm
and AGAIN!!
Historic St. Thomas in Philadelphia to
welcome Jeremiah Wright as revivalist
http://www.episcopalchurch.org/81803_96694_ENG_HTM.htm
April 28, 2008 at 7:27 pm
From Cultural Etiquette: A Guide for the Well-Intentioned:
“No person of color can be a racist as long as white people maintain power. This is because racism is “power over.” A person of color may have race prejudice, but until most of Congress, state, provincial, and local governments, the Pentagon, the FBI, CIA, all major industries, the Stock Exchange, Fortune 500 members, the educational system, health care system, the International Monetary Fund, the armed forces, and the police force are all operated and controlled by people of color and their cultural values, we do not have the kind of power that it takes to be racist toward anyone. Similarly, “reverse racism,” within the context of present society, is a contradiction in terms.”
I hope this answers your question.
April 28, 2008 at 7:54 pm
How to respond to something as inane as this? “People of color” can have “race prejudice” but cannot “be racist toward anyone”? What kind of Through-the-Looking-Glass, linguistic pretzel logic is that?
Oh, I forgot. You’re UCC, where white people are terminally guilty, and no person of color, no matter how hateful, irrational, or immoral (see the Puerto Rican terrorists that the UCC has been shilling for) can do any wrong, where people are ONLY judged by the color of their skin, and never by the content of their chaaccter. I guess Dr. King’s legacy really is dead in the racist liberal mainline.
April 28, 2008 at 7:58 pm
Well, since Dr. King was hardly one to shy away from criticizing the government I think he would emphatically support Rev. Wright. It was, after all, Dr. King who said that the “American government is the most violent in the world” when speaking out against the Vietnam War. Of course, history likes to “whitewash” (literally) the more fiery and provocative statements by MLK. This way we can believe in platitudes and not do anything about our fundamental problems.
April 28, 2008 at 8:13 pm
Such as racism indulged in by people of whatever color.
April 28, 2008 at 8:39 pm
Mike,
I’m descended from Ulster Scots. Persecuted in Britain, Ireland and forced to live in the wilderness of North America, they (we?) were pushed wherever people did not want to go because there was nowhere else to go.
Do I get a special pass now to say whatever I want? Do I get compensation for my ancestor’s losses?
No, nor would I want them. Because they triumphed! And so did the African-American people. Let’s stop blaming and start building. All Wright knows how to do–at least in his speeches–is point the finger and accuse.
The spotlight is wasted on him.
April 28, 2008 at 9:06 pm
The UCC leadership defends Wright because their “liberation theology” chickens have come home to roost.
For decades the UCC has been pushing the envelope regarding leftist political thought. When one of their principal leftists–Jeremiah Wright–comes under attack, of course, they will defend him.
The good news is that the UCC is so infested with leftist political cronies that the denomination’s demise is but a matter of years. The last I read the UCC has lost over 65% of its membership.
The UCC leadership has about as much credibility in our nation’s discourse of ideas as does Louis Farrahkan and his Nation of Islam.
As this battle rages in the political arena, the American public are going to get an earful and an eyeful of the radical nature of the UCC.
Obama will wish he were a Muslim instead of a UCC member before this storm passes over.
April 29, 2008 at 1:41 am
More here:
http://acropolisreview.com/2008/04/bill-moyers-interviews-jeremiah-wright.html
April 29, 2008 at 9:01 am
If I didn’t know better (and I really don’t know better), I’d say that Jeremiah Wright has embarked on a campaign designed to sink Barack Obama’s presidential campaign. Perhaps it is payback for Obama’s distancing of himself from Wright. Perhaps it is intentional so that at the end of the day Wright can claim that Obama lost because of racism.
April 29, 2008 at 12:37 pm
Larry,
All mainline denominations have lost members in the last 50 years. The UCC has had a similar rate of decline compared with other mainline denominations. Interestingly, this has very little, if anything, to do with ideological and theological perspectives. The very conservative congregational churches that chose not to join the UCC in 1957 have experienced an identical rate of decline. This is because they shared similar demographics, not theology. My local congregation is experiencing its most rapid growth in its 150 year history. The three UCC congregations in our county here have grown by 30% over the last ten years. Much of the decline in membership is in the midwest, while many congregations on the West Coast are growing.
April 29, 2008 at 3:44 pm
Interesting – for the first time in history we are peeling back the layers of history to reveal unresolved hurts and pain. We will not be the same – at least I hope not. The arguments at their core are memories of the MLK days. Sad we haven’t progressed much since then – at the root level and not the superfical affirmative action debate level. Yes we have made economic and social strides but the root is still being iqnored. Once we get pass the sermons of Jeremiah can we take up the issues of righteous and justice. It seems that the church has yet still to carry that banner beyond the signwriter, blog and especially political party alligence. Sad. Quite honestly the subscribers to reform theology to which I belong need to get pass defending the reformation and rise up the Jesus of the reformation – to a level where He is as controversial today in addressing current issues as when He walked the earth. By the way aren’t we suppose to be representing Him? When is the last time you created a stir that wasn’t based in the circle where everyone looked, talked and acted like you? Most issues defended by the church today are Mosaic in nature – (homosexuality, do’s and don’ts, ritual, etc…) These things need to be addressed in the light of God’s Holy word – true, But what about righteous and justice? Not a popular message from most pulpits these days especially when it goes beyond CNN political sound bits.
April 29, 2008 at 4:41 pm
Go watch the videos on you tube, just search DrLeonardHorowitz’s page. Then decide for yourself. This so called pastor is too lazy do his own research!
April 30, 2008 at 9:49 am
Here are more links to research – it is not just Rev. Wright questioning the origin of HIV/AIDS
http://www.boydgraves.com/
http://onlinejournal.com/health/102605Mazza/102605mazza.html
http://tetrahedron.org/articles/aids-coverups/aids_coverups.html
May 1, 2008 at 6:00 pm
Dave, your websites are all part of the same Horowitz crackpot cadre. Tetrahedron is his website. Anyone who attributes any credibility to these theories is woefully trying to prove that, yes, a teapot is orbiting Saturn. Look, these are all rehashed theories originally propagated and owned up to by former Soviet purveyors of misinformation trying to sow dischord in the US. Sadly 255 or so of African American still believe this crap.
As for the rest of Wright’s assertions, I think he and I could argue the toss. I don’t agree with him on some of them but at least they are not as patently false as the Government AIDS Invention theory.
May 1, 2008 at 6:01 pm
Teapot orbiting Saturn… I can’t prove 100% that there isn’t one but there is no credible evidence that there is. Same with the theory of man-made AIDS