I’ve been out all afternoon, and got home to find out that the PCUSA General Assembly has decided that the denomination’s future lies with the Episcopal Church and the United Church of Christ. It voted to pass overture 05-09, entitled “On Deleting G-6.0106b and Substituting a New Paragraph in Its Place; on Amending G-14.0240 and G-14.0450; and on Providing a New Authoritative Interpretation.” The heart of the matter is that this:
Those who are called to office in the church are to lead a life in obedience to Scripture and in conformity to the historic confessional standards of the church. Among these standards is the requirement to live either in fidelity within the covenant of marriage between a man and a woman (W-4.9001), or chastity in singleness. Persons refusing to repent of any self acknowledged practice which the confessions call sin shall not be ordained and/or installed as deacons elders, or ministers of the Word and Sacrament.
Will be replaced with this:
Those who are called to ordained service in the church, by their assent to the constitutional questions for ordination and installation (W-4.4003), pledge themselves to live lives obedient to Jesus Christ the Head of the Church, striving to follow where he leads through the witness of the Scriptures, and to understand the Scriptures through the instruction of the Confessions. In so doing, they declare their fidelity to the standards of the Church. Each governing body charged with examination for ordination and/or installation (G-14.0240 and G-14.0450) establishes the candidate’s sincere efforts to adhere to these standards.
This proposal now goes to the presbyteries, which will make the final decision. If they approve, ordination of sexually active gays will be the prevailing practice across the denomination (some individual presbyteries may continue to refuse to ordain such individuals, but I don’t know whether that would be constitutionally permissible or not). However, for those presbyteries that can’t wait for the Great Unwashed in conservative jurisdictions to weigh in, they have this handy item, which doesn’t require church-wide approval, and essentially opens the gates immediately:
That the 218th General Assembly (2008) to approve the following authoritative interpretation of G-6.0108 of the Book of Order:
The 218th General Assembly (2008) affirms the authoritative interpretation of G-6.0108 approved by the 217th General Assembly (2006). Further, the 218th General Assembly (2008), pursuant to G-13.0112, interprets the requirements of G-6.0108 apply equally to all ordination standards of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.). Section G-6.0108 requires examining bodies to give prayerful and careful consideration, on an individual, case-by-case basis, to any departure from an ordination standard in matters of belief or practice that a candidate may declare during examination. However, the examining body is not required to accept a departure from standards, and cannot excuse a candidate’s inability to perform the constitutional functions unique to his or her office (such as administration of the sacraments).”
Translation: presbyteries are now free to allow candidates to express “scruples” regarding G-6.0108b, and to ignore it if they choose to. So even if the repeal of that provision doesn’t pass the presbyteries, San Francisco, Hudson River, Twin Cities, and any other presbytery that wants to ordain sexually active gays to the office of teaching elder are now free to do so.
It’ll be interesting to see what happens in those congregations that have been considering disaffiliation or seeking dismissal in the next couple of months. I wouldn’t be surprised to see a significant increase in the number of churches doing so, even with the declaration of war against the New Wineskins and EPC at this GA.
UPDATE: Presbyterian Outlook reports this statement from the Presbyterian Renewal Network:
[T]he Presbyterian Renewal Network said the assembly’s vote places the PC(USA) “in spiritual jeopardy.”
It said in a statement: “Today the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) lies gravely wounded, by the hand of its own General Assembly. This assembly has struck multiple blows, threatening to sever the sinews that hold us together as a Christian body and as a part of the larger body of Christ.”
The Outlook story also stated:
In its action – approving an overture from Boston presbytery – the assembly also issued a new authoritative interpretation that withdraws authoritative constitutional statements in force since the 1970s that had declared homosexual practice incompatible with ordained ministry.
Remember, an “authoritative interpretation” needs no ratification from anyone. The PCUSA is now on record that it believes homosexual behavior is compatible with the ministry of Word and Sacrament. Once again, whether the proposed repeal of G-6.0108b happens or not, the PCUSA is now officially in the camp of gay-approving denominations, along with the Episcopal Church and the United Church of Christ.
June 27, 2008 at 6:51 pm
it’s actually worse than that. Item #2 on the 05-09 gets rid of all the Authoritative Interpretations previously in force.
Alan
June 27, 2008 at 7:36 pm
We here in the United Church of Christ wish to extend a warm welcome to our brothers and sisters in the PCUSA. Congratulations!!!!
June 27, 2008 at 7:45 pm
Certainly not unexpected this GA would once again send the abolition of the fidelity and chastity clause to the presbyteries for approval.
For those who are still in the PCUSA the difference this time around is the absence of the thousands who previously actively opposed the elimination of the fidelity and chastity clause.
Presbyteries that have voted to keep fidelity and chastity in the three prior votes now find the conservative activists are gone and the milquetoasters are all that remain.
Unlike the vote in 2000 where 76% of the presbyteries overturned the GA, I am expecting 55% of the presbyteries will approve the GA’s decision.
To the “not-in-my-church” crowd consider this your due warning.
June 27, 2008 at 8:02 pm
I would like to know what the renewal network people think there is left to fight for? The battle was lost when the first of those who held a liberal theology openly revealed themselves to their Presbyteries and no discipline was forthcoming. This was the inevitable outcome. And if you think this is as bad as it can get, wait til you see what is coming around the bend. Check out Robert Gagnon’s site http://www.robgagnon.net/ for details of the kinds of spirituality of sexuality that is coming around the bend. This is the tip of the Christ-denying iceburg. http://www.robgagnon.net/AARGayMen'sGroup.htm
June 27, 2008 at 8:16 pm
David, just two small quibbles: First, the fidelity and chastity requirement that can now be “scrupled” is G-6.0106b, not G-6.0108, which in fact is the section that deals with freedom of conscience (“scrupling”) itself.
Also, strictly speaking, by removing the AIs, the PCUSA is not “on record that it believes homosexual behavior is compatible with the ministry of Word and Sacrament.” We’re simply no longer on record that it isn’t. This wiped out everything said on the subject since WWII. We no longer have any authoritative teaching on sexual morality whatsoever. We’re a blank slate.
Pray for us.
June 27, 2008 at 8:18 pm
Oh, Adel asks “what the renewal network people think there is left to fight for”. The answer is our churches, the thousands of faithful congregations left in the PCUSA, and the hundreds of thousands of souls in our care. Isn’t that enough?
June 27, 2008 at 8:44 pm
Andy: Thanks for the corrections. I’ve been repeatedly confused by the designations. As for the AIs, I see what you mean, but I suspect that leadership, as well as the usual suspects in the caucuses, will spin this as approval.
June 28, 2008 at 1:08 am
Let me get this straight. Does this mean that as a PCUSA elder I can now start cheating on my wife and no one can do anything about it?
And if someone were to take action against me, wouldn’t it be a valid defense that I cannot be held to a different standard than homosexuals, since the requirements of chastity and fidelity are being abolished?
June 28, 2008 at 8:41 am
Let me get this straight. Does this mean that as a PCUSA elder I can now start cheating on my wife and no one can do anything about it?
Well, here is the text of the new G-6.0106b:
Those who are called to ordained service in the church, by their assent to the constitutional questions for ordination and installation (W-4.4003), pledge themselves to live lives obedient to Jesus Christ the Head of the Church, striving to follow where he leads through the witness of the Scriptures, and to understand the Scriptures through the instruction of the Confessions. In so doing, they declare their fidelity to the standards of the Church. Each governing body charged with examination for ordination and/or installation (G-14.0240 and G-14.0450) establishes the candidate’s sincere efforts to adhere to these standards.
Well … unfortunately the bible does talk of adultery, Thou Shall Not Covet Thy Neighbor’s Wife, I’m not sure anyway can twist the meaning of that, unless you can find a different translation for the Hebrew word translated as covet.
So I’m not sure if you can cheat on your wife, but other sexual immorality seems to be available.
June 28, 2008 at 9:35 am
David, thanks for your report. To this former Episcopalian (now CANA Anglican), the reports from PCUSA are tragic. I’d hoped that TEC’s descent over the cliff would be a warning to the other mainline denoms., but PCUSA seems eager to jump over too.
The reports from the IRD’s PCUSA General Assembly blog sound scarily familiar. PLEASE note the entry on the massive increase planned in litigation funding to fight New Wineskins and the EPC:
http://www.theird.org/NETCOMMUNITY/Page.aspx?pid=692&srcid=693
See the entry “Two Million Ways to Afflict Congregations”
Note this section:
Is the church on the verge of crisis? General Assembly must think so, since it voted to approve a forty-fold increase in its litigation funds! It estimated that nearly a quarter of its presbyteries would get embroiled in costly litigation over departing congregations.
June 28, 2008 at 9:40 am
RefCat is basically right, I think, if only because there’s no organized lobby for (marital) adulterers in the PCUSA. Your suggestion would be met with the same sputtering indignation that greets comparisons to loving, respectful, covenanted, monogamous incestuous relations between adults. In other words, you’re right, but no one will listen.
If you’re really set on this adultery thing, though, you might want to declare a scruple regarding the seventh commandment. In that case, it would be up to your presbytery to determine whether it’s “essential.” The best part is that based on recent GAPJC rulings (which, come to think of it, may or may not apply any longer – who knows?) the presbytery is forbidden to say categorically that it will not ordain unrepentant adulterers. And if you feel that they’ve dismissed your case without adequately weighing whether or not your other gifts for ministry outweigh this one little peccadillo, you can file a disciplinary complaint against the presbytery at the Synod level. Sounds like fun, eh?
For more wonderfulness, you might let slip that you’re involved in an open marriage, or shacked up with four women, or something like that. Outright polygamy – claiming to be actually married to them – is still verboten (the attempt last night to redefine marriage failed), but as far as I can tell, there are no longer any rules whatsoever about multiple infidelity. And you’ve got Solomon on your side!
Good luck. I hope your wife is understanding.
June 29, 2008 at 8:23 pm
[...] Pastor has numerous posts on the GA. This one is in keeping with the general theme. “Once again, whether the proposed repeal of G-6.0108b happens or not, the PCUSA is now [...]