For years, Americans United for Separation of Church and State has maintained the fiction that it is a religiously neutral organization that is simply looking out for the First Amendment freedoms of all Americans. It isn’t often that AU drops the mask enough to demonstrate that it is actually a coalition of religious liberals and secular leftists whose mission demands the condemnation, not just of church-state separation violators, but of any conservative form of faith (especially Christian, of course). Rob Boston illustrates this nicely on the “Wall of Separation” blog:
A new survey about religion in America has the Religious Right all worked up.
Researchers at Trinity College in Hartford noted a sharp rise in the number of Americans who, when asked to state their religious preference, replied “none.” According to some polls, this bloc of Americans now accounts for about 15 percent, and Trinity researchers say it may rise to 20 percent by 2030.
There’s no mystery why this would be disturbing to faithful Christians (those to whom Boston is referring with his sneering expression “Religious Right”). To the extent that people are losing faith, or leaving the church of Christ, that should bother anyone who considers matters of faith to be something more than trivial matters of fashion. But Boston has an idea why this is happening:
I have to wonder if church-based politicking hasn’t played a role in the rise of the “nones” as well. Several polls have shown that Americans are uncomfortable with politics emanating from the pulpit. People go to a house of worship to get close to God or share fellowship with other believers – not to be told which candidate to support or hear a lecture on public policy.
Yet the Religious Right keeps egging pastors to politicize their pulpits and to sermonize constantly about abortion, same-sex marriage and now even health-care reform. No wonder people are voting with their feet.
I happen to agree that endorsing candidates and lecturing on public policy don’t belong in the pulpit. What I find amusing is that Boston seems to think that this only goes on in churches beholden to the “Religious Right.” In the cloistered halls of Americans United, they have apparently never heard of Jim Wallis, Brian McLaren, Michael Kinnimon, Katharine Jefforts-Schori, John Thomas, Clifton Kirkpatrick, Tony Campolo, Ron Sider, Carlton Veazey, Welton Gaddy, or any of the other hundreds of leaders of the “Religious Left,” or the thousands of liberal preachers who regularly use their pulpits to deliver themselves of their opinions about environmental legislation, health care reform, capital punishment, nuclear weapons, immigration reform, or, yes, abortion and gay marriage.
But that’s only apparently. Of course they know all about the Wallises and McLarens and Kinnimons at AU, and they heartily approve of what they do in politicizing churches to the left. Americans United also approves of their seeking to push churches to the left in terms of their approach to theological teaching:
This trend terrifies the Religious Right, of course. How dare Americans presume to interpret holy books and articles of faith for themselves, unaided by TV preachers, dogmatic clergy or other go-betweens?
Leaders of the Religious Right just don’t get it. The intolerance, near-fanatical insistence on adherence to a narrow dogma and obsession with politics are driving many away – yet they just keep it up.
You’d think that Boston didn’t know that there are some denominations where clergy are expected to be “dogmatic” (i.e., teach Christian doctrine as revealed by God rather than as mere human opinions, and thus dismissable), and where members don’t want their preachers offering mush. You’d think that Boston didn’t know that some denominations and many Christians don’t consider the glories of historic orthodoxy “narrow dogma.” In fact, he does, and doesn’t care. For AU, the enemy isn’t simply breaches of the “wall of separation.” It’s conservative Evangelical and Catholic Christianity.
September 29, 2009 at 7:08 pm
I may be wrong, but it’s my impression that conservative churches are growing and the liberal ones are the ones that are emptying out?
September 29, 2009 at 8:18 pm
Facts! Facts! That’s all some people can see! 🙂
Actually, Tom, I think your impression is correct in large part. There are conservative churches that are declining, as there are liberal churches that are growing, but by and large you’re right. Certainly the mainline is in steep decline. But that has nothing to do with any of that bad stuff that AU doesn’t like. 🙂
September 30, 2009 at 2:02 pm
It seems to me that it wasn’t to long ago that President Obama was asking Christian pastors and rabbis to preach about healthcare.
September 30, 2009 at 2:17 pm
And did so without a peep from AU that I could find.
September 30, 2009 at 5:55 pm
It’s not the “conservative” churches that people are leaving.
September 30, 2009 at 5:56 pm
I would consider my church “conservative” (although we are totally apolitical). We have almost doubled in size in the past 8 years.
October 2, 2009 at 9:45 am
I do not think the number of actual “none” is rising more so than the people who used to think they needed to say “Christian” in polls are decreasing.
October 6, 2009 at 12:55 pm
[…] LEFTIANITY– “For years, Americans United for Separation of Church and State has maintained the […]
February 26, 2010 at 12:17 pm
RE: It seems to me that it wasn’t to long ago that President Obama was asking Christian pastors and rabbis to preach about healthcare.
The law allows tax-exempt religious organizations to discuss issues and recommend political solutions. What it does not allow is partisan politicking, where a candidate is promoted or denigrated.
AU is very aware of this distinction and does not object to pastors or rabbis engaging in issue advocacy. President Obama is well within his rights to ask religious leaders to discuss an issue with their congregations which may very well benefit from some spiritual insight.
My sense is that Americans don’t want their pastors telling them who to vote for. But for those pastors who want to encourage their flocks to support a particular politician or party, there is a simple solution: give up the religious tax exemption.